Abstract
The experience of General medical practitioner (GP) fundholding is analysed for evidence of the response by family doctors to financial incentives. An analysis of consultant outreach, the local provision of out-patient services, in Scotland finds little evidence of a response, based on comparing the experience of fundholders with non-fundholders. At least in the case of hospital based services, financial incentives seem to be of secondary importance. Financial incentives for such services depend on consultant compliance which, arguably, was missing when it came to creating a two-tier service which deliberately favoured patients from fundholding practices.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.