Abstract
Theoretical models suggest that firms may pursue riskier strategies in times of financial distress. For example, financially weak firms may compromise safety and quality to maximize current period profits. If the riskier strategy fails, then the stockholders are content to hand over the bankrupt firm to the debt holders. Despite much interest, there is little, if any, empirical evidence that relates financial health to the risk-taking behavior of firms. We explore this relationship for the airline industry. Using bond ratings to proxy for financial health and airline mishaps to measure safety, we find a significant correlation: airlines with higher quality bond ratings are less likely to experience mishaps than airlines with lower quality ratings. On average, an airline with an investment grade bond rating has a 25% lower probability of a mishap than an airline with a below investment grade bond rating. The findings imply that the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) should shift part of its inspection and surveillance resources from financially strong airlines to financially weak airlines. Further, reliance on readily available bond ratings makes it easy to implement these recommendations.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.