Abstract

Contrary to the objective of a major corporate pension reform in Japan to enhance retirement income security, and despite the increased relative tax benefits of externally-funded plans, the number of firms that do not sponsor externally-funded defined benefit plans or defined contribution plans has been increasing steadily. We study the common characteristics of firms sponsoring only traditional internally-funded lump sum plans that provide only weak protection of the employees’ retirement benefits. We find that smaller firms with higher growth prospects (price-to-book ratios) and a younger workforce are less likely to adopt externally-funded plans and more likely to terminate them when they have one. Firms sponsoring only internally-funded plans tend to exhibit lower profitability than their peers with otherwise similar characteristics. These results suggest that smaller firms with higher growth prospects and a younger workforce tend to have stronger incentives to ensure financial flexibility by providing only weak protection of their employees’ retirement benefits.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call