Abstract
Our study examines whether financial distress risk is systematic risk using twelve portfolios sorted by size, book-to-market, and leverage and a portfolio of distressed firms covering an 18-year period. It also tests the explanatory power of the risk factors that best capture default risk. The empirical findings show that: (i) equity portfolio investment requires systematically both size and value premiums and that SMB and HML capture additional risk missed by the market portfolio; (ii) the leverage risk premium is positive for highly leveraged firms; and (iii) the risk premium for the relative distress factor is significant only for the distressed firm portfolio. Overall, our results have practical implications for portfolio managers since they advocate a leverage-augmented three-factor model to accurately price assets and to implement efficient portfolio strategies.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
