Abstract

When a financial crisis breaks out, speculators typically get the blame whereas fundamentalists are presented as the safeguard against excessive volatility. This paper proposes an asset pricing model where two types of rational traders coexist: short-term speculators and long-term fundamentalists, both sharing the same information set. In this framework, excess volatility not only exists, but is actually fueled by fundamental trading. Since fundamentalists use buy-and-hold investment strategies and do not react to shocks, they have a negative impact on liquidity. As a consequence, speculators are pushed toward more aggressive trading. The destabilizing effect increases with the proportion of fundamentalists among traders. In conclusion, efficient markets are more volatile with a few speculators than with many speculators. The first-best situation still corresponds to the case where speculators are totally absent, but this is unlikely on real markets. Regulators should therefore be aware that efforts to limit speculation might, surprisingly, end up increasing volatility.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.