Financial Capability: Clinicians' Assessment of Beneficiaries With Dual Diagnoses

Abstract

Objective: Adults with mental health disorders whose ability to work is sufficiently impeded are entitled to financial supports from the Social Security Administration. Beneficiaries determined to be incapable of managing these funds are supposed to be assigned a representative payee to assist beneficiaries in meeting their needs. However, patterns of payee assignment suggest that payee assignment is impacted by factors other than those the Social Security Administration instructs clinicians to consider. In this study, we tested the association between clinicians' judgments of their clients' financial capability and hypothesized predictors (demographic characteristics, psychiatric diagnosis, recent alcohol and other substance use, self-rated money mismanagement, recent homelessness, and provider characteristics). We posited that predictors might act indirectly on capability judgment via their impact on beneficiaries' money management. Methods: Altogether, 261 people receiving intensive mental health care who did not have payees or fiduciaries were enrolled after providing written informed consent. These beneficiaries completed in-person assessment interviews, reporting demographic characteristics, treatment history, substance use, and homelessness. Mental health clinicians identified by the beneficiaries were enrolled in the study and asked to judge their clients' financial capability with standard Social Security instructions for determining capability. Bivariate associations between hypothesized predictors and clinicians' determinations of incapability were tested. In multivariate probit regression models, incapability determination was modeled as a function of all beneficiary and clinician characteristics that had significant bivariate associations with the outcome. Results: Providers identified 24% of their clients as financially incapable. Determinations of financial incapability were unrelated to any beneficiary or provider demographic characteristics but were positively associated with money mismanagement, homelessness, and having a psychotic disorder. Alcohol use and other substance use were only significantly associated with capability determinations indirectly through their effects on money mismanagement. Conclusions: Providers' judgments of beneficiaries' capability to manage their funds were associated with factors that were consistent with Social Security Administration guidelines and were, importantly, not associated with personal characteristics. This finding suggests that guidelines can be fairly applied by clinicians and that reported inconsistencies in payee assignment are accounted for by other factors. The Social Security Administration is currently considering other approaches to standardize capability determinations.