Abstract

Despite the expansion of phylogenetic community analysis to understand community assembly, few studies have used these methods on mobile organisms and it has been suggested the local scales that are typically considered may be too small to represent the community as perceived by organisms with high mobility. Mobility is believed to allow species to mediate competitive interactions quickly and thus highly mobile species may appear randomly assembled in local communities. At larger scales, however, biogeographical processes could cause communities to be either phylogenetically clustered or even. Using phylogenetic community analysis we examined patterns of relatedness and trait similarity in communities of bumble bees (Bombus) across spatial scales comparing: local communities to regional pools, regional communities to continental pools and the continental community to a global species pool. Species composition and data on tongue lengths, a key foraging trait, were used to test patterns of relatedness and trait similarity across scales. Although expected to exhibit limiting similarity, local communities were clustered both phenotypically and phylogenetically. Larger spatial scales were also found to have more phylogenetic clustering but less trait clustering. While patterns of relatedness in mobile species have previously been suggested to exhibit less structure in local communities and to be less clustered than immobile species, we suggest that mobility may actually allow communities to have more similar species that can simply limit direct competition through mobility.

Highlights

  • Understanding patterns of species diversity and assembly is a major objective of research in ecology, evolution and biogeography

  • Phylogenetic Assemblage Analysis We identified 110 assemblages in 8 of the 45 grid cells in Nearctic areas to analyze tongue length and relatedness across cooccurring species

  • When tested for clustering of phylogenetic distance and nearest neighbor distance, local assemblages were significantly clustered for mean phylogenetic distance (MPD) (Wilcoxon signed-rank test of MPD: Z = 2.159, p = 0.031, Table 2, Figure 2)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Understanding patterns of species diversity and assembly is a major objective of research in ecology, evolution and biogeography. The recent development of methods to integrate phylogenetics into community ecology–‘‘phylogenetic community ecology’’–makes it possible to simultaneously address spatial and temporal questions about how species assemble and what processes impact assemblage membership [1]. Concern has been raised about the scales at which phylogenetic community methods are measured and whether expanding questions to biogeographical scales and considering a more diverse array of taxa could improve our understanding of community assembly [2,3,4]

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call