Abstract
Abstract The Economics philosophy of Pancasila was born as criticism of crisis occurred in neoclassical economics in Indonesia. Mubyarto identify the neoclassical economics crisis of historical, sociological, metaphysics, epistemological, and axiological dimension. Mubyarto offers the Economics philosophy of Pancasila as a solution by offering approach which more considering the sociological and historical dimension of Indonesian plurality. The economics philosophical assumptions must be relied on the philosophy and ideology of Pancasila, not based on liberal ideology. Although there are still any pro and contra opinion about the Economics philosophy of Pancasila, we can say that Mubyarto has succeeded to show the data and fact, identify causes of the Indonesian economics crisis, offer a solution for social science crisis in Indonesia by the Economics philosophy of Pancasila. In the other side, Mubyarto’s Economics philosophy of Pancasila faces obstacles, such as the lack of adequate response of other economic scientists, and no economics theory that is really constructed appropriates with the Indonesian socio-cultural condition. Keyword: Mubyarto, philosophy, social science, economics, Pancasila
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
