Abstract
BackgroundMost clinical trial publications include figures, but there is little guidance on what results should be displayed as figures and how.PurposeTo evaluate the current use of figures in Trial reports, and to make constructive suggestions for future practice.MethodsWe surveyed all 77 reports of randomised controlled trials in five general medical journals during November 2006 to January 2007. The numbers and types of figures were determined, and then each Figure was assessed for its style, content, clarity and suitability. As a consequence, guidelines are developed for presenting figures, both in general and for each specific common type of Figure.ResultsMost trial reports contained one to three figures, mean 2.3 per article. The four main types were flow diagram, Kaplan Meier plot, Forest plot (for subgroup analyses) and repeated measures over time: these accounted for 92% of all figures published. For each type of figure there is a considerable diversity of practice in both style and content which we illustrate with selected examples of both good and bad practice. Some pointers on what to do, and what to avoid, are derived from our critical evaluation of these articles' use of figures.ConclusionThere is considerable scope for authors to improve their use of figures in clinical trial reports, as regards which figures to choose, their style of presentation and labelling, and their specific content. Particular improvements are needed for the four main types of figures commonly used.
Highlights
Much has been written about how to visually display quantitative information, [1,2,3,4] and some attention has been paid to the specific constraints of including figures in Medical journal articles [5,6,7,8,9]
There is considerable scope for authors to improve their use of figures in clinical trial reports, as regards which figures to choose, their style of presentation and labelling, and their specific content
Particular improvements are needed for the four main types of figures commonly used
Summary
Much has been written about how to visually display quantitative information, [1,2,3,4] and some attention has been paid to the specific constraints of including figures in Medical journal articles [5,6,7,8,9]. In order to understand current practice, we undertook a survey of recent publications of randomized clinical trial in major general medical journals. This provides objective evidence as to the extent of use of figures in trial reports,. Trials 2007, 8:36 http://www.trialsjournal.com/content/8/1/36 including which types of figure are chosen by authors. This survey facilitates constructive critical appraisal of both the good features and the limitations of how authors and journals are utilizing figures for visual display of results. Purpose: To evaluate the current use of figures in Trial reports, and to make constructive suggestions for future practice Most clinical trial publications include figures, but there is little guidance on what results should be displayed as figures and how.
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
