Abstract
Planning is a common tool for addressing important health issues, especially urgent ones, and has been reintroduced recently in several federal, state, and local public health programs. This article presents a case study of planning and policy making concerning the reemergence of tuberculosis in urban areas, using Washington, D.C. and New York City as examples. Planning was unsuccessful in D.C. because it failed to acknowledge the important political and bureaucratic aspects of policy making. In New York City, on the other hand, planning played a central role in policy-making efforts, and the health department took a leadership role in building a consensus on the problem, formulating strategies, and overcoming implementation obstacles. This article concludes with several key considerations for making planning more effective in health policy-making.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
