Abstract

Research QuestionDid a 15-min patrol delivery over 1 day reduce serious violent crime in large hot spots (mean size = 2 km × 2 km), without displacing such crimes to nearby areas?DataWe tracked daily official crime reports in a sample of 21 high-crime Bedfordshire (UK) Lower-layer Super Output areas (LSOAs). We measured time spent by two-person police foot patrols in those areas with daily GPS data from handheld devices given to officers working on overtime. We also counted proactively initiated arrests.MethodsWe used a crossover randomised controlled trial on the 21 “hot spot” LSOAs, each of which was randomly assigned daily to be either in a treatment condition of 15-min of patrol (as one of seven each day) or a control condition of no patrol (as one of 14 each day) for each of 90 days. We used an intention-to-treat framework to analyse the impact of patrols on the outcome measures overall, on consecutive days of assignment to the same condition, and in 100-m ‘buffer’ zones around each hot spot.FindingsWe found that on treatment days the hot spots had 44% lower Cambridge crime harm index scores from serious violence than on control days, as well as 40% fewer incidents across all public crimes against personal victims. Statistically significant differences in lower prevalence, counts and harm of both non-domestic violent crime and robbery and other non-domestic crimes against personal victims were also found. We found no evidence of either displacement of serious crime into a 100-m buffer zone, nor any evidence of residual deterrence on no-patrol days following patrol days. We did find evidence of a cumulative effect: the largest differences in crime harm on control days were found in treatment days that came after 3 days of consecutive patrol in the same LSOA.ConclusionsEven minimal amounts of foot patrol can prevent serious violent crime across a large area, and repeated patrols over several days help even more. Our findings suggest that, to reduce both violent and other forms of crime, uniformed officers need to patrol hot spots for short amounts of times on consecutive days.

Highlights

  • Hot spot policing, among all crime prevention strategies, has what may be the largest body of research evidence supporting its cost-effectiveness (Braga et al, 2019)

  • The large differences in police presence in the hot spots on assigned location-days aligned with statistically significant reductions in the prevalence, volume and harm of violence and robbery and other crimes against personal victims

  • 434 286 183 118 80 52 33 26 15 8 5 5 4 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 equates to a 44% lower level of crime harm from serious violence in public places on days in which layer Super Output areas (LSOAs) were randomly assigned to one 15-min foot patrol over a day, as well as a 40% lower count of public crimes against personal victims

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Among all crime prevention strategies, has what may be the largest body of research evidence supporting its cost-effectiveness (Braga et al, 2019). In the UK, for example, despite repeated demonstrations of the effectiveness of small doses of foot patrol in crime hot spots (Ariel et al, 2016, 2020), we know of no police agency that has implemented a comprehensive, force-wide patrol strategy to target hot spots of violence, with precision and close tracking, on a daily basis. Such a strategy has been especially viable after repeated investments of extra funding for policing against serious violence, as of 2021 worth over £100 million in total (Home Office, 2019). We present the results of ‘Operation Rowan’, a crossover randomised controlled trial run by Bedfordshire Police

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call