Abstract
Since 1992, the International Federation of Association Football
 (FIFA) has been ranking senior men’s national soccer teams based on a variety
 of criteria. In 2003, FIFA extended the FIFA/Coca-Cola World Rankings into
 ranking senior women’s national soccer teams. The FIFA/Coca-Cola World
 Rankings published just before the 1994 FIFA World Cup USA, 1998 FIFA
 World Cup France, 2002 FIFA World Cup Korea/Japan, 2006 FIFA World Cup
 Germany, 2010 FIFA World Cup South Africa, 2014 FIFA World Cup Brazil,
 2018 FIFA World Cup Russia, 2003 FIFA World Cup USA, 2007 FIFA World
 Cup China, 2011 FIFA World Cup Germany, 2015 FIFA World Cup Canada,
 and the 2019 FIFA World Cup France were considered. These rankings were
 compared to the final results of those FIFA World Cups based on two different
 methods of displaying the teams finish and were analyzed. Of the top 16
 teams in each of the Men’s FIFA World Cups, 74.1% of those teams advanced
 to the Round of 16. Meanwhile, 83.9% of the top 12 teams in each of the
 Women’s FIFA World Cups advanced to the Round of 16 or Quarterfinals.
 The Pearson correlation coefficient between the Pre-Tournament rankings and
 final results was calculated using both ranking methods. The Women’s World
 Cups had higher Pearson correlation coefficients for both methods than the
 Men’s World Cups. In addition, the Women’s World Cups had higher t-values
 and z-scores than the Men’s World Cup when tested for independence and
 association between the Pre-Tournament rankings and final results using both
 ranking methods. These findings indicate that the Women’s World Cups were
 more predictable than Men’s World Cups based on the FIFA/Coca-Cola World
 Rankings.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: Proceedings of International Mathematical Sciences
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.