Field versus race pace conditions to provoke exercise-induced bronchoconstriction in elite swimmers: Influence of training background

Abstract

BackgroundDiagnosing Airway hyper-responsiveness (AHR) requires bronchial provocation tests that are performed at rest and after exercise or hyperventilation in either a lab or field setting. Presently, it is unclear whether the proposed AHR field test for swimming induces sufficient provocation due to lack of intensity. Thus we aimed to examine how the 8 minute field swim test compared to all out racing and a lower intensity practice exposure affected AHR. We hypothesized that the race would affect AHR the most thereby highlighting the importance of maximal effort in swim AHR. Methods10 female and 15 male swimmers completed three conditions (sanctioned race of different distances, 8 min field swim challenge and swim practice). Forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expired volume in 1 second (FEV1) and forced expiratory flow (FEF25-75) were measured at rest and after each exercise condition (at 6 and 10 min) in accordance with standard protocols. AHR was defined as a decrease in FEV1 of ≥10% post exercise. ResultsA significant increase in FEV1 and FEF25-75 was observed for both post swim field test and post-race. The practice condition reduced FEV1 in 44% of swimmers although the magnitude of change was small. There was a wide variability in the individual responses to the 3 conditions and AHR was diagnosed in one swimmer (race condition). ConclusionAll conditions have poor sensitivity to diagnose EIB and total accumulated ventilation (distance swum) did not influence AHR. These results also indicate that elite swimmers, despite many risk factors, are not limited by respiratory function in race conditions. It is proposed that the swim field test not be used for AHR assessment in swimmers due to too high relative humidity.