Field Testing of Synthetic Growth Charts in 1-60-Month-Old Indian Children.

Abstract

Background:Malnutrition among under-five children (U5C) in India is a major public health problem due to double burden caused by nutritional transition. WHO cut-offs are adopted as global growth standards which define how children should grow in condition of optimal nutrition and health. Growth references which are representative of population-specific existing growth patterns need to be updated regularly which is cumbersome; hence, the author’s group published ‘synthetic growth references’ for Indian children of age 0–18 years.Objectives:The objective of this study is to field test the new synthetic growth references in U5C for height-for-age, weight-for-age and body mass index (BMI)-for-age against WHO charts in urban and rural Indian children to estimate prevalence of various indices of malnutrition.Methods:A cross-sectional anthropometric assessment of apparently healthy rural and urban Indian U5C attending vaccination centre was performed using standard protocols. They were converted to Z-scores using WHO and Indian synthetic growth references. The equality of proportion of parameters of malnutrition was tested by McNemar’s test and P value <0.05 was considered significant.Results:WHO charts significantly overestimated stunting and malnutrition as compared to synthetic references with difference in sensitivity of 7.2% and 8.5%, respectively, and converse for over-nutrition by 2.1%. The most commonly affected parameter of malnutrition was underweight. Stunting was significantly higher in rural population using both cut-offs (P < 0.05).Conclusion:The synthetic references limit the spread of weight and BMI and do not overestimate stunting and wasting. They may be more useful for identification of malnutrition and may thus be recommended for routine screening in Indian U5C.