Abstract
Housing conditions can affect health of cows by increasing exposure to biological, chemical, and physical hazards, resulting in increased disease. A report in 2014 indicated that 99% of UK dairy cows are housed during winter months and that an increasing number of farms are committing to year-round indoor-housing management systems. Current literature does not provide a clear understanding of the relationship between cow health, welfare, and production, and the housing environment. Loafing space, in this case defined as non-feed, non-lying, and non-high traffic areas of the housed environment, is considered an important component of housing for dairy cows; however, the scientific literature associated with this subject is sparse internationally. The aim of this research was to explore current housing of dairy cows across Great Britain, with specific focus on understanding the practices and variability associated with space allowance. A secondary aim was to explore farmer opinions and knowledge on the value of living space. A single researcher visited 53 randomly selected farms, from a representative sample group, once during the winter housing period 2017-18. Data collection consisted of 3 elements: collation of basic farm details, precise measurement of adult dairy cow accommodation, and a questionnaire to capture farmer opinions on space allowances. Statistical analysis was undertaken to assess variation among farms in total space, loafing space, and living space per cow. A new metric, termed "living space," was defined to describe the additional space availability for dairy cows above that deemed to be a baseline requirement. Large variability was identified between farms in total space available per cow, with a range from 5.4 to 12.7 m2 [mean = 8.3 m2, median = 8.2 m2, interquartile range (IQR) = 1.9 m2]. The mean living space was 2.5 m2, with a range of 0.5 m2 to 6.4 m2 (median = 2.4 m2, IQR = 1.6 to 3.2 m2). Responses from a farmer questionnaire on importance of loafing space revealed that farmers felt it was essential for cow welfare, over half of farmers scoring this ≥8 on a 0 to 10 scale. Farmers were categorized into 4 latent classes based on their attitudes toward the importance of loafing space. In a linear model to predict the "living space" provided on each farm, geographical location and latent class of farmer attitude were covariates significantly associated with the amount of space provided. This study is the first worldwide to quantify variability in loafing and living spaces for dairy herds; further research is required to evaluate the extent to which variation in quantity and quality of space influences cow health, welfare, and productivity, as well as farm economics and emissions.
Highlights
The human literature reports important links between the physical and mental health of people and their built environment (Gan et al, 2017); the housing in which people spend the majority of their time has been shown to be important for human health (Hancock, 2002)
Fifty-three farms participated in the study, giving a response rate of 75.7%
Most farms stocked all of their cows in lactation in freestall buildings (26), with 2 farms housing
Summary
The human literature reports important links between the physical and mental health of people and their built environment (Gan et al, 2017); the housing in which people spend the majority of their time has been shown to be important for human health (Hancock, 2002). Housing conditions can affect the health of inhabitants by increasing exposure to biological, chemical, and physical hazards, resulting in increased disease (Bonnefoy, 2007; Jacobs, 2011). Populations of humans with the worst-quality built environments (measured by assessing access to amenities, air quality, and building design or layout) are known to be associated with greater incidence of disease (Hood, 2005), especially respiratory disease, which has been highlighted as a key outcome measurement of housing quality (Krieger and Higgins, 2002). Inadequate space allowance in human housing is considered the most important factor when assessing housing poverty (Blake et al, 2007; WHO, 2016), with overcrowding increasing the likelihood of disease transmission (WHO, 2016). A consensus panel (comprising the National Agricultural Statistics Service and the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service)
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
