Field and simulation studies on yield, water and nitrogen dynamics and use efficiency in rice-wheat crops in sequence

Abstract

ContextThe dominant rice-wheat cropping system in the Indo-Gangetic plain faces challenges of water depletion and nitrogen pollution of groundwater as well as declining productivity caused by over irrigation and nitrogen fertilization by the farmers. To appreciate the apt use of irrigation water and nitrogen fertilizer in rice and wheat crops it is essential to explore the water and nitrogen balances as well as dynamics in these crops, involving complex interaction between weather, soil, irrigation water and nitrogen fertilizer management. ObjectiveThe objective of the study is to quantify yield, field water balance components, water use efficiency, water productivity, water footprint, and water and nitrogen dynamics of rice and wheat crops in relation to season, varieties, irrigation regimes and nitrogen levels. MethodsField experimentations were conducted in double split plot design along with calibrated and validated HYDRUS 1D model use for two years comprising of treatments in rice i.e. two varieties (PR122-V1 and PR126-V2), two irrigation regimes (2-days drainage period-I1 and soil water suction 16 kPa-I2) and two nitrogen levels (120-N1 and 90-N2 kg N ha−1); and in wheat, two varieties (Unnat PBW343-V1 and Unnat PBW550-V2), two irrigation (1.2 IW/CPE-I1 and 0.9 IW/CPE-I2) regimes and two nitrogen levels (120-N1 and 90-N2 kg N ha−1). ResultsThe highest grain yield recorded was 7.6 t ha−1 in treatment combination of V1I2N1 in rice and 5.4 t ha−1 in V1I1N1 in wheat owing to better plant growth and yield attributes (biomass production, number of effective tillers, panicle length, and 1000 grain weight). Total water footprints were lower in the treatment combination of V1I1N1 in rice and V1I2N1 in wheat. The water budget revealed a higher percent contribution of the total water input to drainage (62 %) in rice ensuing restoration of water in the soil profile; and to evapotranspiration (ET) (100 %) in wheat ensuing water depletion. Modeling water and nitrogen dynamics showed higher root water uptake in I2 treatment in rice and with I1 treatment in wheat; and leaching losses of NO3-N under rice than wheat; and under I2 treatment than I1 as well as in N1 than N2. ConclusionsThe V1I2N1 treatment in rice and V1I1N1 treatment in wheat demonstrated superior grain yield, soil water storage, and root water uptake. Conversely, V1I1N1 treatment in rice and V1I2N1 treatment in wheat showed higher water use efficiency and lower water footprint. SignificanceIt helps to evaluate the effectiveness of irrigation and nitrogen management strategies in maximizing crop productivity while minimizing environmental impacts.