Abstract

Many police departments claim to have implemented or institutionalised problem-oriented policing (POP), and scholars have found POP to be effective in reducing crime and disorder. However, studies routinely find that POP has not been implemented in a fashion consistent with Goldstein's original conceptualisation; this inconsistency has resulted in ambiguity regarding the elemental components of POP. The current study addresses a gap in knowledge by investigating the fidelity of the implementation of POP in a small police department. Implementation of POP in this agency is of particular interest; the chief is a nationally known proponent of POP, has published on POP, and announced that POP would be institutionalised in the department. Using a triangulated methodology, the study finds that this police department has not implemented POP. The study also highlights the implications of these findings on fidelity for both policing scholars and practitioners.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call