Abstract
The production of fictitious interviews in field studies of drug abuse has been suspected on any number of occasions, and many researchers in the drug field have caught their interviewers constructing such fraudulent data. In the current experiment, several sets of fictitious and real data were compared and statistical differences were observed. While the technique cannot detect individual fictitious interview schedules, it does have promise for detecting fraudulent data on a mass basis.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
