Abstract

In this paper, I intend to provide a critical analysis of one of the conceptual schemes operating in Simone de Beauvoir’s The Second Sex: the intersubjective relationship between consciousness and the possibility, defended by the author, of women’s emancipation through a reciprocal recognition between men and women. To this end, I propose to confront this scheme with two distinct philosophical models for the interaction between consciousness: the one underlying the Hegelian argument of the “struggle” for recognition between master and slave (explicitly mobilized by Beauvoir) and the one elaborated by Fichte, particularly in his Iena’s years, in the name of an “exhortation” to freedom (not suggested by Beauvoir). My basic hypothesis is that the model presented by Fichte could perhaps contribute to the discussion on women's emancipation in Beauvoir, avoiding a possible impasse of her argument related to the tension between the Hegelian model of the struggle between master and slave and the specific solution for women's emancipation, as a reciprocal recognition between the sexes, with which the analyses of The Second Sex culminate.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.