Fibrillar matrix, Echogenicity, Contour, Thickness, and Suture (FECTS) vs. Global: A comparison of 2 scales developed to assess ultrasound images post rotator cuff repair.

Abstract

Ultrasound is commonly used to assess rotator cuff repair (RCR), but no standardized criterion exists to characterize the tendon. The aims of this study were to (1) develop content validity for ultrasound specific criteria to grade the postoperative appearance of a tendon after RCR, (2) assess the reliability of the criteria, and (3) assess the feasibility to use these assessments. Following expert consultation and literature review for content validity, 2 scales were created: 1) the Fibrillar matrix, Echogenicity, Contour, Thickness, and Suture (FECTS) scale and 2) the Rotator Cuff Repair-Investigator Global Assessment (RCR-IGA). Aprospective cohort study was undertaken on patients who had received a RCR and serial B-mode ultrasound images. Four raters assessed the 64-ultrasound images using the scales created in a blinded fashion using intraclass correlation coefficients. The FECTS scale was a composite score with 5 key parameters and the RCR-IGA scale was a 5-point global score. The intrarater reliability for the FECTS scale was excellent for the most experienced rater (0.92) and fair for the rater with no experience (0.72). The intrarater reliability for the RCR-IGA scale was excellent for 3 of the 4 raters (0.80-0.87) and fair when used by the least experienced rater (0.56). Inter-rater testing for all the FECTS scale parameters had excellent reliability (0.82-0.92) except for Fibrillar matrix (0.73). The average time to complete the FECTS scale per image was 23seconds and 11seconds for the RCR-IGA scale. The FECTS scale and the RCR-IGA scale are reliable tools to assess the ultrasonic appearance of the repaired rotator cuff tendon. The FECTS scale was more reliable for less experienced assessors. The RCR-IGA scale was easier, more time efficient and reliable for those with experience.