Fertility-sparing surgery for treatment of non-epithelial ovarian cancer: Oncological and reproductive outcomes in a prospective nationwide population-based cohort study

Abstract

ObjectiveTo compare the oncologic outcome of women who underwent fertility-sparing surgery (FSS) vs. radical surgery (RS) for treatment of NEOC in a prospective, nationwide, population-based study and report on the reproductive outcomes in women after FSS. MethodsUsing the Swedish Quality Register for Gynecological Cancer, we identified all women ages 18–40 treated with either FSS or RS for stage I NEOC between 2008 and 2015. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were compared using the Kaplan-Meier method. Data on use of assisted reproductive technology (ART) treatments and obstetrical outcomes after FSS were extracted from the National Quality Register for Assisted Reproduction (Q-IVF) and the Swedish Medical Birth Register. ResultsDuring the study period, 73 women ages 18–40 received a stage I NEOC diagnosis. The majority, 78% (n = 57), underwent FSS. The 5-year OS rate, regardless of surgical approach, was 98%. There were no statistical differences between OS and PFS rates in women treated with FSS, compared to RS. Recurrences were more common after RS than FSS: 12.5% (2/16) vs. 3.5% (2/57), respectively. Following FSS, 11 women gave birth to 13 healthy children (all conceived naturally). Additionally, 12% of the women in the cohort developed infertility and received ART treatment (n = 7). ConclusionFSS is not associated with worse oncologic outcomes than RS in young women with early stage NEOC. The prognosis was excellent in both groups, with an OS of 98%. Natural fertility was maintained in women treated with FSS, only 12% required ART treatment.