Abstract

The ASTRIO study was a randomised, multicentre, 24-week study that compared the effects of ferric citrate hydrate (FC) and non-iron-based phosphate binders (control) on anaemia management in haemodialysis (HD) patients receiving erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs). In that study, FC reduced the doses of ESAs and intravenous iron without affecting haemoglobin (Hb); however, the cost-effectiveness of FC was unclear. We retrospectively implemented a cost-effectiveness analysis comparing the incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) in FC (n = 42) and control (n = 40) groups in patients with serum phosphate and Hb controlled within the ranges of 3.5–6.0 mg/dL and 10–12 g/dL, respectively. Costs included drug costs of phosphate binders, ESAs, and intravenous iron. Elevated red cell distribution width (RDW) has been reported to be associated with mortality in HD patients and was therefore used as an effectiveness index. The mean (95% confidence interval) differences in drug costs and RDW between the FC and control groups were US$ − 421.36 (− 778.94 to − 63.78, p = 0.02) and − 0.83% (− 1.61 to – 0.05, p = 0.04), respectively. ICER indicated a decrease of US$ 507.66 per 1% decrease in RDW. FC was more cost-effective than non-iron-based phosphate binders. Iron absorbed via FC could promote erythropoiesis and contribute to renal anaemia treatment.

Highlights

  • The ASTRIO study was a randomised, multicentre, 24-week study that compared the effects of ferric citrate hydrate (FC) and non-iron-based phosphate binders on anaemia management in haemodialysis (HD) patients receiving erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs)

  • Ninety-three haemodialysis patients with hyperphosphataemia were assigned in a 1:1 ratio to the FC group (n = 48) or control group (n = 45)

  • The current cost-effectiveness analysis using the ASTRIO study results for Japanese haemodialysis patients with hyperphosphataemia showed that FC was more cost-effective than continued use of non-iron-based phosphate binders in terms of lower total drug costs and a smaller change in red cell distribution width (RDW), as an effectiveness index correlated with all-cause mortality in haemodialysis patients

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The ASTRIO study was a randomised, multicentre, 24-week study that compared the effects of ferric citrate hydrate (FC) and non-iron-based phosphate binders (control) on anaemia management in haemodialysis (HD) patients receiving erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs). The Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) ­guidelines[4,5] and JSDT g­ uidelines[6,7,8] recommend the use of phosphate binders to treat hyperphosphataemia and erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) and iron preparations to treat renal anaemia. Previous clinical studies in haemodialysis patients with hyperphosphataemia showed that iron-based phosphate binders, ferric citrate (Auryxia®, Akebia Therapeutics, Inc., MA, USA) and its hydrate (FC; Riona®, Torii Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan), improved serum phosphate levels and increased haemoglobin (Hb) levels and reduced the required doses of ESAs and intravenous i­ron[12,13,14]. One report noted that reducing the administration of ESAs and intravenous iron lowered the hospitalisation rate, which was expected to save an additional US$ 3,002 per patient per year in hospitalisation ­costs[17]

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call