Abstract

Chronic Chagas disease cardiomyopathy (CCC) is the most important clinical manifestation of infection with Trypanosma cruzi (T. cruzi) due to its frequency and effects on morbidity and mortality. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) infiltrate the tissue and differentiate into inflammatory macrophages. Advances in pathophysiology show that myeloid cell subpopulations contribute to cardiac homeostasis, emerging as possible therapeutic targets. We previously demonstrated that fenofibrate, PPARα agonist, controls inflammation, prevents fibrosis and improves cardiac function in a murine infection model. In this work we investigated the spontaneous release of inflammatory cytokines and chemokines, changes in the frequencies of monocyte subsets, and fenofibrate effects on PBMC of seropositive patients with different clinical stages of Chagas disease. The results show that PBMC from Chagas disease patients display higher levels of IL-12, TGF-β, IL-6, MCP1, and CCR2 than cells from uninfected individuals (HI), irrespectively of the clinical stage, asymptomatic (Asy) or with Chagas heart disease (CHD). Fenofibrate reduces the levels of pro-inflammatory mediators and CCR2 in both Asy and CHD patients. We found that CHD patients display a significantly higher percentage of classical monocytes in comparison with Asy patients and HI. Besides, Asy patients have a significantly higher percentage of non-classical monocytes than CHD patients or HI. However, no difference in the intermediate monocyte subpopulation was found between groups. Moreover, monocytes from Asy or CHD patients exhibit different responses upon stimulation in vitro with T. cruzi lysates and fenofibrate treatment. Stimulation with T. cruzi significantly increases the percentage of classical monocytes in the Asy group whereas the percentage of intermediate monocytes decreases. Besides, there are no changes in their frequencies in CHD or HI. Notably, stimulation with T. cruzi did not modify the frequency of the non-classical monocytes subpopulation in any of the groups studied. Moreover, fenofibrate treatment of T. cruzi-stimulated cells, increased the frequency of the non-classical subpopulation in Asy patients. Interestingly, fenofibrate restores CCR2 levels but does not modify HLA-DR expression in any groups. In conclusion, our results emphasize a potential role for fenofibrate as a modulator of monocyte subpopulations towards an anti-inflammatory and healing profile in different stages of chronic Chagas disease.

Highlights

  • The acute phase of Trypanosoma cruzi (T. cruzi) infection is characterized by the presence of parasites in the host bloodstream that disseminate to the heart and other organs

  • When we studied human leukocyte antigen D related (HLA-DR) expression in the classical monocyte subpopulation, we observed that stimulation with T. cruzi tends to raise the mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of monocytes from Chagas heart disease (CHD) patients and treatment with fenofibrate displays a trend to restore it to basal levels (Figure 7A)

  • Regarding Chagas disease, while the relevance of parasite persistence as a trigger of tissue damage is currently acknowledged in the development of chronic Chagas disease cardiomyopathy (CCC), the role of the different components of the inflammatory response remains unclear (Zhang and Tarleton, 1999; Lopez et al, 2018; Wesley et al, 2019)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The acute phase of Trypanosoma cruzi (T. cruzi) infection is characterized by the presence of parasites in the host bloodstream that disseminate to the heart and other organs. This promotes a severe inflammatory response with recruitment of mononuclear cells, activation of resident macrophages, and release of pro-inflammatory mediators. This response is associated with parasite persistence in the heart and other tissues, due to the fact that the immune response is not efficient to wipe out the infection, leading to lifelong infection (Trachtenberg and Hare, 2017). The persistence of activated macrophages in the tissues may create an inflammatory microenvironment that, in turn, contributes to developing tissue damage during the course of these pathological processes (Rőszer et al, 2013)

Objectives
Methods
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call