Abstract

Feminist solidarity, after early and idealistic conceptions of an all‐encompassing sisterhood, has become preoccupied with understanding and theorizing differences between women. This study develops an account of solidarity as embodied agonism, where difference and contest are experienced and negotiated through the body. Difference and contest are reframed within feminist solidarity projects as resources for, rather than inhibitors to, generating collective agency. This is done through an ethnography of a protest movement in Montenegro, which drew together diverse groups of women, and bring our data into conversation with theories of agonistic democratic practice and embodied performativity. Embodied agonistic solidarity is theorized as a participative and inclusive endeavour driven by conflictual encounters, constituted through the bodies, language and visual imagery of assembling and articulating subjects. Our account of solidarity is presented as constituted through three dimensions, each of which represents a different emphasis on sensory experience: exposing, which is to make one's body open to the hardship of others, enabling alliances between unlikely allies to emerge; citing, which is to draw on others’ symbolic resources and to publicly affirm them; inhabiting, which is to embody the deprivations of others, enabling alliances to grow and persist.

Highlights

  • Solidarity building has long preoccupied feminist academics and practitioners invested in the notion that significant social change can only be achieved collectively (Arruzza, Bhattacharya, & Fraser, 2019)

  • Three dimensions of embodied agonistic solidarity building are analysed: exposing, citing and inhabiting, each denoting a different aspect of the practice that unfolds through contest

  • We return to the solidarity, agonism and embodied performativity literature to elaborate on our contributions and to suggest future paths for the study of feminist solidarity

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Solidarity building has long preoccupied feminist academics and practitioners invested in the notion that significant social change can only be achieved collectively (Arruzza, Bhattacharya, & Fraser, 2019). With some notable exceptions (e.g., Cranford, 2012; Vacchani & Pullen, 2019), feminist solidarity building remains under-theorized within organization studies, meaning that we do not know enough about the practices that can assist its generation. This study draws on ethnographic data from a major women's protest and proposes a democratic form of embodied agonistic solidarity. Embodied agonistic solidarity is a practice that cultivates collective agency through difference and conflict. We develop our account by placing Chantal Mouffe's (2009a, 2009b, 2013, 2014) theory of agonistic democratic practice and Judith Butler's (2006, 2011, 2015, 2016) theory of performativity in dialogue with data generated through an ethnographic study in Montenegro

Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call