Abstract
The arguments on which some criticisms of Pardo Bazán are based today,questioning her feminism, are deeply misguided historically and therefore fail to realize thatPardo Bazán, it is true, was a conservative and a feminist, but not a conservative feminist. Shewas a writer and a Catholic, but not a Catholic writer. Pardo Bazán's feminism used the variouslanguages available in her time (the same as today's feminisms do) to elaborate a highly radicaland distinctly modern proposal that formed a substantial part of the double debate of the latenineteenth and early twentieth centuries on the access of the masses to politics and on women'scitizenship. More specifically, on the complex relations between religion, liberalism and earlyfeminism at a historical crossroads that she perceived, and that was, fundamental. This article isdedicated to demonstrate it.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
