Abstract

Reproductive investment affects both offspring and parental fitness and influences the evolution of life histories. Females may vary their overall primary reproductive effort in relation to the phenotypic characteristics of their mate. However, the effects of male quality on differential resource allocation within clutches have been largely neglected despite the potential implications for mate choice and population dynamics, especially in species exhibiting biparental care and brood reduction. Female southern rockhopper penguins Eudyptes chrysocome paired with heavy mates reduced intra-clutch variation in egg and albumen masses. Females paired with new mates also reduced intra-clutch variation in yolk androgen levels. Since both an increased mass and increased androgen concentrations positively influence chick survival under sibling competition, the chances of fledging the whole clutch are likely to be higher for newly formed pairs with heavy males than for previously formed pairs with light males. Interestingly, total clutch provisioning did not vary with male quality. We show for the first time that females vary intra-clutch variation in resource allocation according to male quality. In species with brood reduction, it may be more adaptive for females to modulate the distribution of resources within the clutch according to breeding conditions, than to change their total clutch provisioning.

Highlights

  • Life-history theory predicts that individuals should adjust their reproductive investment to the fitness gain they can expect in return [1,2,3]

  • The differential allocation hypothesis proposes that the selection might favor individuals that allocate resources differently according to the phenotypic characteristics of their current mate and the likelihood of finding a better mate in the future [4,5]

  • It has been established that females vary their primary reproductive effort [6], in egg size and composition for example, in relation to their mate’s phenotypic characteristics

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Life-history theory predicts that individuals should adjust their reproductive investment to the fitness gain they can expect in return [1,2,3]. Egg composition in nutrients, hormones or antibodies, for example, does not always vary consistently with male attractiveness [11,12]. This dissimilarity could be explained by the different fitness gains expected when increasing egg size or when modulating egg composition. The benefit of modifying egg composition, such as increasing yolk hormones, is more context-dependent [17,18,19]. Both mechanisms can have implications for mate choice and population dynamics [19,20,21]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.