Abstract

Objective: Previous studies have showed a potential disadvantage of female patients who underwent abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair. The current study aims to determine sex-specific perioperative and long-term outcomes using propensity score matched unselected nationwide health insurance claims data. Methods: Insurance claims from a large German fund were used, covering around 8% of the insured German population. Patients who underwent endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) for intact AAA from 1 January 2011 to 30 April 2017 were included in the cohort. A 1:2 female to male propensity score matching was applied to adjust for confounding variables. Perioperative and long-term outcomes after 5 years were determined using matching and regression methods. Results: Among a total of 3736 patients (19.3% females, mean 75 years) undergoing EVAR for intact AAA, we identified 1863 matched patients. Before matching, females were more likely to be previously diagnosed with hypothyroidism, electrolyte disorders, rheumatoid disorders, and depression, while males were more often diabetics. In the matched sample, 23.4% of the females and 25.8% of the males died during a median follow-up of 776 and 792 days, respectively. Perioperatively, females were more likely to exhibit acute limb ischemia (5.3% vs. 3.2%, p = 0.031) and major bleeding (22.0% vs. 15.9%, p = 0.001) before they were discharged to rehabilitation (5.5% vs. 1.5%, p < 0.001) when compared to males. No statistically significant difference in perioperative (odds ratio 1.12, 95% CI 0.54–2.16) or long-term mortality (hazard ratio 0.91, 95% CI 0.76–1.08) was observed between sexes. This was also true regarding aortic reintervention rates after 1 year (2.0% vs. 2.9%) and 5 years (10.9% vs. 8.1%). Conclusion: The current retrospective matched analysis of insurance claims revealed high early access-related morbidity in females when compared to their male counterparts. Short-term or long-term survival and reintervention outcomes were similar between sexes.

Highlights

  • The scientific discussion around sex disparities and female patient disadvantage in cardiovascular medicine has been ever-present for decades [1]

  • There is growing evidence for different symptoms in females vs. males suffering from peripheral arterial occlusive disease (PAOD) [2,3,4], coronary artery disease [5], atrial fibrillation [6,7], and heart failure [8]

  • We identified 3736 patients (17.3% females) who underwent EVAR for intact abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The scientific discussion around sex disparities and female patient disadvantage in cardiovascular medicine has been ever-present for decades [1]. As for PAOD, previous publications suggested a female sex disadvantage with regard to invasive and pharmacological treatment, emphasizing the urgent need for sex-specific research [3,4,9,10]. Most valid societal practice guidelines on diseases of the peripheral arteries to date contain very few sex-specific recommendations [11,12,13,14]. The open surgical approach (OSR) and endovascular (EVAR) treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) has been illuminated by numerous observational studies during recent decades [15,16,17,18].

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call