Female multiple mating as a genetic bet‐hedging strategy when mate choice criteria are unreliable

Abstract

Female multiple mating (or polyandry) is considered to act as a genetic bet‐hedging mechanism, by which females can reduce the assessment error in regard to mates’ genetic quality when only uncertain information is available. In spite of frequent verbal arguments, no theoretical examination has been carried out to determine the effectiveness of bet‐hedging by multiple mating. In the present paper, I show that three factors, female population size, remating costs and environmental fluctuation, all affect the effectiveness of bet‐hedging. A mathematical model predicts that bet‐hedging effectively works only in small populations, and computer simulations were used to confirm this prediction. The results of simulations differed according to the degree of environmental fluctuation. In relatively stable environments, if there is no remating cost, the fixation probability of a multiple mating strategy is slightly higher than that of a single mating strategy, independent of female population size. However, with very slight fitness costs, multiple mating drastically loses its advantage as population size increases, and almost always becomes extinct within large populations. This means that the evolution of polyandry solely by the mechanism of bet‐hedging is unlikely in stable environments. However, in unpredictable environments, or when negative frequency‐dependent selection on fitness‐related loci is introduced, a multiple mating strategy is sometimes successful against a single mating strategy, even if it entails a small fitness cost. Therefore, female multiple mating may possibly evolve only in these limited conditions. In most cases, some deterministic mechanisms such as postcopulatory sperm selection by multiply mated females (or direct ‘material’ benefits) are more reasonable as the evolutionary causes of polyandry.