Abstract

Philopatry and monogamy are conventionally viewed as strategies for improving fitness. Many philopatric and monogamous species have, however, been shown to perform breeding dispersal—an exchange of territory (and often also partner) between two breeding seasons. The adaptiveness of breeding dispersal remains controversial, as data remain scarce and sporadic. For the Northern Goshawk, a typically highly philopatric and monogamous forest raptor, pairs breeding in barren forest landscapes produce fewer fledglings than pairs breeding in more productive landscapes. Using data on Finnish breeding female Goshawks (Accipiter gentilis) during 1999–2016, we tested the hypotheses that: (1) breeding dispersal is more likely at barren territories, (2) dispersing females move to less barren territories, and (3) breeding dispersal improves the survival of young. About 29% of the female Goshawks in our study performed breeding dispersal, which contrasts to philopatry and suggest that site and partner fidelities show large variation within the species’ breeding range. We found no evidence that territorial landscape barrenness (proxy on habitat quality) affects the probability of breeding dispersal. However, females that dispersed upgraded to less barren territories. Nevertheless, there were no subsequent effects of breeding dispersal on reproductive performance, suggesting no obvious difference in the capability of rearing young at either site. Although dispersal events were directed to less barren habitats, we suggest that female dispersal is not driven by the pursue for more prospersous habitats, rather that those females are forced to move, for whatever reason. In addition to other observed reasons such as female–female competition for mates and loss of the original mate, intense logging of mature forests lowering local food availability and restricting nest site availability were likely a partial cause of increased breeding dispersal.

Highlights

  • The selection of a breeding territory and a partner are among the most central decisions animals make pre-breeding, having direct effects on fitness (Reynolds 1996)

  • One reason for the lack of research on breeding dispersal is that dispersal events often will go undetected in typical field studies, and is difficult to separate from mortality, especially if untracked individuals disperse outside the study area (e.g. Cilimburg et al 2002)

  • Since there was no evidence for non-random associations of alleles at different loci in the study population, all 11 loci can be independently used as genetic markers (Table S1, Table S4)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The selection of a breeding territory and a partner are among the most central decisions animals make pre-breeding, having direct effects on fitness (Reynolds 1996). An established territorial adult sometimes changes breeding territory, and often this is associated with partner replacement This behaviour is referred to as breeding dispersal and has been broadly reported in the literature, but the current knowledge regarding its causes and consequences remain scarce, and have received little attention (Newton 2010). This suggests that various factors may drive breeding dispersal through a range of individual and environmental conditions

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call