Feltham-Ohlson Framework: The Implication of Corporate Tax

Abstract

In this paper, we provide an empirical work in order to test the tax-adjusted market valuation (residual income) model. Feltham-Ohlson's (1995) residual income model can be extended by adding corporate tax: firm market value is a function of the bottom line after-tax accounting data, e.g., book value and after-tax earnings. Under this tax-adjusted framework, certain issues are examined: the information from the firm's operating activities is not enough to measure the firm's market value; financial activities also affect firm market value. In particular, abnormal financial earnings are not equal to zero, due to the tax deduction on interest expenses. An empirical analysis, using the financial reporting data of Canadian firms for the years 1994-1999, demonstrates that the current book value of financial assets and operating assets, abnormal operating earnings, and abnormal financial earnings are all relevant to firm market value. The sensitivity tests, which define the corporate tax rates in different ways, do not change the results. The sensitivity test, which uses the financial analysts' forecasts, does not change the results, either. Furthermore, the empirical analysis shows that abnormal financial earnings enhance firm share price more when the firm has lower non-tax costs, i.e., firm business risk (financial distress) and bankruptcy costs. It supports the previous research on capital structure to the extent that debt financing benefits a firm more when non-tax costs are lower.