Abstract

In Lopez et al. (2009), we reported an outbreak of feline leukaemia virus (FeLV) in the Donana Iberian lynx population, and described the management measures adopted for its control. Among the factors suspected to increase the individual contact rate (and thus the potential for favouring the dispersion of the FeLV), we discussed the implication of supplementary feeding stations (SFS). However, the SFS were not considered to play a central role in the spreading of the virus throughout the population (see Lopez et al., 2009). Palomares, Lopez-Bao & Rodriguez (2010) provide a potential explanation for the evolution of the FeLV outbreak in the Donana population based only on partial data (videoand photo-trapping inside the SFS and radio-tracking data), which may lead to fundamental misconceptions when interpreting the possible scenarios for the evolution of this outbreak: only 10 individuals out of the 16 living in the Coto del Rey subpopulation (CRS) in late 2006 were radiotagged, while videoand photo-trapping conducted inside the SFS does not provide complete knowledge of the use of space by the Iberian lynx. All FeLV-viraemic Iberian lynxes detected in 2007 were from the CRS subpopulation. Coto del Rey is an area of about 10 000 ha of suitable habitat for the Iberian lynx (according to Palomares, 2001), with stable breeding territories in the north and south and a central connecting area commonly used in dispersal (Fig. 1). During 2007, two of the six juveniles living in CRS were recorded both in the north and in the south (Fig. 1), and two more were also suspected to move between the two breeding cores. Moreover, no lynx from any other subpopulation was recorded that year in CRS. Under this scenario, we consider that Coto del Rey acted as a single subpopulation when the FeLV was circulating. Because Roman (a male living in the south of CRS) was the first detected FeLV-positive individual, Palomares and colleagues assume that he was also likely to be the first FeLV-infected Iberian lynx in the population. Given that two of the 10 Iberian lynxes (Inesperado and Cacao) found to be FeLV-viraemic had neither been radio-tagged nor analysed by late 2006, we believe that this is a risky assumption. A plausible alternative explanation for the origin of the outbreak is that either Inesperado or Cacao (who comes from the same territory in north CRS) were first infected by contact with a domestic cat and that the virus reached south CRS as one of these untagged individuals moved between the two breeding cores in CRS. Thus, although the hypothesis proposed by Palomares and colleagues is plausible, we cannot discard other ecologically possible scenarios either. Although the SFS may seem not to be the main factor explaining the transmission of FeLV throughout the population, we consider that its potential role in the spread of the outbreak cannot be neglected. Although both the intersexual differences in the response to FeLV observed in the Iberian lynx and the low sample size prevent the drawing of definitive conclusions, explanations regarding the role of the SFS that do not take these two factors into account may be oversimplistic. All five adult males living in CRS were positive and became persistently infected, while only two of the adult females were positive and both turned the virus into latency. Only one adult female (Wari) out of the three females sharing the SFS with Roman in 2006 was analysed in 2007, and tested negative. In our opinion, the fact that Wari was negative in September does not mean that she was not infected during the mating season, as a complete clearance from infection can occur in both domestic cats (Barr & Bowman, 2006) and the Iberian lynx (LIFE project, unpubl. data). Support for this idea comes from the fact that Wari and Roman copulated after the male tested positive, and copulation is thought to be one of the most effective ways of transmitting FeLV (Rojko & Kociba, 1991). One of the two other females sharing the SFS with Roman in 2006

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call