Abstract
ABSTRACT Public discussion of blockbuster films and TV shows increasingly focuses on the power of representation, with certain works celebrated for their potentially beneficial effects. That celebration, however, often rests on the assumption of non-diverse audiences. Using media discourse on the film Wonder Woman (2017) as a case study, this article examines testimonies describing the psychological effects of fictional content in medicalized terms. Repeated references to tears and hunger tie narrative representation to the bodies of marginalized people, suggesting that responses to representation are involuntarily experienced in a standardized form. In many cases, the unexpected nature of these responses is highlighted. This article argues that public discussions of fictional media representation reify a strict model of media effects, denying complex or diverse readings and positioning cultural change as dependent on audiences “feeling” hegemonic readings of media texts. This discourse works to exclude those who cannot or will not conform to its affective norms, requiring psychological homogeneity that is rhetorically constructed as inescapably natural—as well as imperative to the promotion of cultural diversity. “Feeling” media associates media consumption with the creation of a better future, describing media effects as powerful precisely because of their presumed ability to remake the world.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
