Abstract

China-Publications has been perceived as a milestone for both the WTO regulatory framework and China’s domestic governance. On the other hand, it also reveals the Dragon’s pains as either a WTO Member or a domestic governor. The acute pain of unequal WTO Membership recurred in terms of China specific rules. Moreover, by exploring cultural regulatory framework in China, one may notice that the majority of China’s administrative regimes and legal framework are elaborately designed for political considerations. The WTO adjudicator’s ruling on the “necessary” test of the measures imposed on cultural products, however, did not give due consideration to China’s political concerns. This may have spill over impact on socialist-political system in China, blocking the progressively trade liberalization of cultural products in China. The China-Publications unveils the limits of China’s national regulatory framework as well, covering both culture and trade aspects, as well as restrictions on WTO legal capacity in China. Though this unpleasant failure experience in defending China-Publications, China needs to contemplate complementing its domestic culture and trade regulatory framework, and enhancing its WTO legal capacity. Presented SIEL Singapore 2012.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.