Feeding In Planktonic Protozoans: Evidence For Non‐Random Acquisition of Prey

Abstract

ABSTRACT The literature on discriminant feeding by planktonic protozoans using geometric and nongeometric criteria is reviewed with emphasis on recent studies that indicate phagotrophic protists can use information other than particle size or shape to sort among potential prey. Sufficient data are available for ciliates, aplastidic microflagellates, and phagotrophic dinoflagellates. Numerous representative taxa of all three groups have chemosensory capabilities, either to specific chemicals or to prey exudates, that modify their motility patterns resulting in aggregation or dispersal. Representatives of all three groups also have specific prey preferences. These considerations imply, but do not prove, selectivity in feeding through use of chemical cues. Although prey geometry is clearly a first‐order determinant of ingestion through passive mechanical selection, recent studies illustrate that planktonic ciliates and flagellates can use other criteria to discriminate among prey. the evidence clearly implicates use of chemical cues, most likely perceived through contact chemoreception. Filter feeders as well as raptors have such abilities indicating that feeding mechanisms per se do not imply limitations on feeding behavior. Evidence of considerable flexibility and complexity in chemoperceptive feeding suggests that we have only glimpsed the more detailed features of feeding behavior in aquatic protozoans.