Abstract

This paper examines methods to incorporate feedforward loops of known external inputs (output reference) into a multi-input feedback control structure to achieve certain robust performance of its output. Undoubtedly, feedforward can reduce the need for feedback and therefore the amplification of sensor noise at actuators, as occurs in single-input control. Beyond that, since there are several available inputs, a convenient distribution of feedforward and feedback can minimise the control action at each input and offer benefits at all frequencies. The procedure is as follows: because there are rough plant models of the behaviour from each input to the output, it is possible to approximate the individual control demand that will satisfy the performance. Based on this, individual feedforward filters allocate the control bandwidth among the inputs in order to build an equivalent plant that has an equal or greater magnitude than any individual plant at each frequency. Next, the uncertainty of this equivalent plant is addressed by feedback that reduces the closed loop deviation of magnitude frequency responses. The reduction is sufficient to enable a master feedforward to place them, at a second step, around the desired tracking performance model without violating any deviation tolerances. Individual feedback controllers distribute the total feedback among the inputs in order to have the least possible feedback at each frequency. A first example illustrates the method and the relevance of a feedforward orientation to reduce the individual control action, instead of the individual feedback action. Another example proves the superiority of adding feedforward loops to feedback-only schemes and highlights the benefits of robust design methods such as Quantitative Feedback Theory (QFT). This paper also provides the algorithms to employ in response to new robust control specifications in the framework of QFT.

Highlights

  • In some cases, several inputs are available to govern the output of feedback control, which is described here as a multiple-input single-output (MISO) control

  • Several combinations of the manipulated inputs can contribute to the required output performance in MISO control

  • Several control inputs contributed to output performance by allocating their participation along the control bandwidth, which resulted in the use of the least possible control action

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

Several inputs are available to govern the output of feedback control, which is described here as a multiple-input single-output (MISO) control. The contribution of as many inputs as possible is desired, if it yields a total plant pm (10) with significantly greater magnitude than the individuals pi (let us remember that gi are filters with unitary gain at the pass band). Their potential collaboration would reduce the individual feedforward actuations |uffi /r| because of the virtual need for total feedforward |uff /r| ≈ |m/pm| would be significantly reduced. The ci=1,...,n feedback task is reducing the closed-loop influence of the pm uncertainty to the extent that a master feedforward gm can position the resulting y/r frequency responses around m with a magnitude deviation less than Wr tolerance

FEEDBACK DISTRIBUTION AMONG INPUTS
FULFILLING SPECIFICATIONS
EXAMPLE 2
CONCLUSION
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call