Feeder cattle frame size, muscle thickness and subsequent beef carcass characteristics

Abstract

Sixty feeder steers were assigned scores for frame size (small, medium or large) and muscle thickness (No. 1, No. 2 or No. 3), fed for 112 days and slaughtered. Grade data were collected for all 60 carcasses; 12 sides (four from each muscle thickness group) were fabricated into boneless, closely trimmed retail cuts and the 12 rounds from each of these sides were also physically separated into muscle, fat and bone. Marbling score and USDA quality grade varied inversely ( P < 0·05) with frame size. Carcass quality grades were: 33·3% Choice; 67·7% Good and 0·0% Standard for small-framed cattle; 30·3% Choice, 42·4% Good and 27·3% Standard for medium-framed cattle and 5·5% Choice, 66·7% Good and 27·8% Standard for large-framed cattle. Analysis of variance showed significant ( P < 0·05) differences among all muscle thickness groups in the longissimus muscle area and carcass weight but no difference in yield grade between the No. 1 and No. 3 muscle thickness groups; the larger mean longissimus muscle area of carcasses from steers in the No. 1 muscle thickness group was offset by their heavier carcass weight and their greater thickness of fat over the longissimus muscle. However, when analysis of covariance was used to hold fatness or fatness and frame size constant, the difference in yield grade between muscle thickness groups No. 1 and No. 3 was significant ( P < 0·05). Also, carcasses from cattle assigned muscle thickness scores of No. 1, as feeders, had the highest ( P < 0·05) muscle to bone ratio of the round (4·1 to 1) while carcasses from cattle assigned thickness scores of No. 3, as feeders, had the lowest ( P < 0·05) muscle to bone ratio of the round (3·4 to 1).