Feedback during summative clinical assessments: Experiences of diagnostic radiography students at a higher education institution in South Africa

Abstract

IntroductionSummative clinical assessments and feedback, conducted at clinical training sites, are vital for successfully preparing undergraduate diagnostic radiography students to become competent, skilled diagnostic radiographers. However, providing appropriate feedback in a clinical context is a complex matter, as studies show that students often feel intimidated by feedback and may only accept feedback selectively, so as to pass their assessment or course. This article reports on the experiences of radiography students regarding summative clinical assessment feedback. MethodsA qualitative, exploratory, descriptive, and contextual research design was used. Data were gathered from radiography students at one higher education institution in South Africa who were registered in year three and year four of a four-year professional Diagnostic Radiography degree. Five semi-structured focus group interviews were conducted, with 26 participants in total. Focus group interviews were audio recorded, transcribed verbatim and coded using Tesch's data analysis method. ResultsTwo principle themes emerged from the data analysis. Theme 1 unpacked whether radiography students viewed the assessor as an ally or foe. It was found that various assessor-related characteristics influenced radiography students receptivity towards feedback and this was related to how they viewed the assessor. Theme 2 concerned the radiography students' perceptions of the key elements influencing the nature of a feedback process. These elements were influenced primarily by the assessor, but the attitudes of radiography students towards the feedback process were also important. ConclusionRadiography students reported various positive experiences regarding assessor feedback during the summative clinical assessments. However, they were also dissatisfied with numerous aspects of how the assessors provided feedback often viewing the assessor as one who is a foe or who is opposed to their success. Subsequently the negative aspects of the feedback process hampered the learning experience of the participants. Implications for practiceAwareness and the development of feedback skills for assessors and radiography students would be beneficial to the learning process. Radiography students, the radiography profession and ultimately the patients would benefit from the effects of effective feedback.