Abstract
There has been recent accumulation of evidence and clinical guidance regarding the at-risk mental state (ARMS) for psychosis. However, most studies have been observational cohort and intervention studies of Western populations. To assess the validity of the ARMS concept and the transition rate to psychosis in a non-Western nation, we retrospectively combined and analyzed clinical data of individuals diagnosed with ARMS who were prospectively followed-up at three specialized clinical services for ARMS in Japan. In total, we included 309 individuals with ARMS, of whom 43 developed overt psychosis. We estimated cumulative transition rates to psychosis with the Kaplan-Meier method, obtaining rates of 12% at 12, 16% at 24, 19% at 36, and 20% at 48 months. Only two individuals reported past cannabis use. Despite several differences among the three sites, transition rates did not differ among them. Furthermore, the transition rate of children aged between 14 and 17 years did not differ from that of individuals aged 18 years or older. Regression analysis revealed that meeting the brief limited intermittent psychotic symptoms (BLIPS) criterion was associated with an increased risk of transition to psychosis, whereas genetic risk factors were not. Although antipsychotic prescription was relatively frequent in this cohort, there was no evidence supporting frequent use of antipsychotics for this population. In conclusion, our findings support the assertion that the current concept of ARMS is applicable in Japan. Development of local clinical guidelines and training for clinicians is necessary to disseminate this concept to more clinical settings.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.