Abstract

This paper has analysed how federalism or territorial pluralism can contribute to increase the quality of democracy and the freedom of the citizenry by favouring political pluralism and the control of power. Political pluralism and territorial pluralism are based on two different logics. Political pluralism indicates the moment of diversity, in which the alternatives that reflect the confrontation of interests and values inherent to all democratic societies are expressed and channelled. Territorial pluralism, in contrast, represents the moment of unity via the defence of the interests of the territory that are claimed against higher instances (the European Union for the Member States, the States for the territorial bodies). At present we can talk about a structural weakness of political pluralism at a European level, and the weakness of territorial pluralism at the infra-state level, which are nothing more than a manifestation of the same phenomenon: the strength and centrality of the State, which is projected in European politics in defence of national interests and reduces the impact of territorial interests in national politics. Rebalancing the excessive presence of the State at European and territorial level requires a revitalisation of internal territorial pluralism and the strengthening of political pluralism in the still incipient European public space.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call