Abstract

AbstractHow do ethnically divided countries create inclusive and stable democratic institutions? Why do some kinds of federalism fail while others evolve? Scholars looking for answers to these kinds of questions have tended to focus on the West. Yet there are important lessons arising from the substantial democratic and federal reforms that have taken place in Asia over the last few decades. These reforms signal a new model of federal democracy in Asia, comprising multilevel ethnoterritorial federalism, mixed-majoritarianism and a party system that includes both ethnic and multi-ethnic parties. This model has emerged as a response to ethnic conflict and secession risks and reflects the high diversity of clustered communities and cross-cutting cleavages. Despite its overarching majoritarianism, the federal model has led to highly fragmented party systems and coalition governments, with positive implications for democratic stability. Together, these features go some way towards blending otherwise conflicting consociational and centripetal paradigms.

Highlights

  • How do ethnically divided countries create inclusive and stable democratic institutions? Why do some kinds of federalism fail while others evolve? Scholars looking for answers to these kinds of questions have tended to focus on the West

  • How do ethnically divided countries balance demands for autonomy with objectives of stability and national unity? Why do some kinds of federalism fail while others evolve? Scholars looking for answers to these kinds of questions have tended to focus on the West

  • This federal model reveals a new approach to achieving democratic stability while accommodating diversity in deeply divided countries, which runs counter to the dominant paradigm, consociationalism, that focuses on proportionality and consensus (Lijphart 1977; McGarry et al 2008), and its competitor, centripetalism, which is majoritarian and thought to be incompatible with consociationalism (Horowitz 2000a)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

How do ethnically divided countries create inclusive and stable democratic institutions? Why do some kinds of federalism fail while others evolve? Scholars looking for answers to these kinds of questions have tended to focus on the West. Mixed political party systems The third key feature of the model of federal democracy in Asia is the nature of the party system, namely whether ethnic, multi-ethnic or mixed.

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call