Abstract

Empiric antibiotic therapy (eg, a combination of ciprofloxacin and metronidazole) is effective in treating the majority of patients with inflammation of the ileal reservoir (pouchitis). Unfortunately, up to 20% of patients develop refractory or rapidly relapsing disease. We developed a fecal sensitivity analysis to determine which antibiotics are most likely to be effective in patients who do not respond to empiric antibiotic therapy or have relapsed after long-term therapy. Fecal samples from 15 patients with active pouchitis (pouch disease activity index [PDAI], > or =7) who failed standard antibiotic treatment were inoculated onto Iso-sensitest agar. Antibiotic testing discs were added, incubated, and sensitivity patterns were recorded. Patients then were treated with antibiotics based on predicted sensitivity; PDAI scores were assessed 4 weeks later. Thirteen patients enrolled in the study had failed to enter remission after treatment with ciprofloxacin and metronidazole and 2 patients had relapsed after maintenance treatment with ciprofloxacin. Antibiotic coliform sensitivity testing showed ciprofloxacin resistance in all samples, co-amoxiclav resistance in 4 samples, trimethoprim resistance in 11 samples, and cefixime resistance in 8 samples. All 15 patients were treated with an antibiotic to which their fecal coliforms were sensitive; 12 (80%) achieved clinical remission (PDAI score, 0). Fecal coliform sensitivity analysis can identify effective antibiotic therapies for patients with antibiotic-resistant pouchitis. This targeted antibiotic approach is recommended in all patients who fail to respond to empiric antibiotic treatment or relapse after long-term antibiotic therapy.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.