Abstract

The paper discusses the complexity and ambiguity of interpretation of plotting binodals (for binary monomolecular polymer + low-molecular-weight liquid systems) or phase separation boundaries (those with a polymolecular polymer) by means of fixing a certain turbidity level when the configurative point moves from the single-phase range towards the phase separation one (the so-called cloud-point curve technique).

Highlights

  • State diagrams, or the phase diagrams of multicomponent systems, underlie modern materials science

  • The so-called cloud-point technique is most frequently applied for the phase analysis of polymeric systems, itconsists in determination of the temperature of the initial cloudiness of a solution, which is regarded as the temperature of phase separation (Tps)

  • It is principally impossible to fix crossing the binodal by fixing a common preset turbidity level when the configurative point is moving along the temperature axis at c = const from the single-phase range to the phase separation range in a certain interval of polymer concentrations by virtue of different degrees of remoteness of the solution of the given concentration from the critical concentration of the system and the critical retardation effect

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The phase diagrams of multicomponent systems, underlie modern materials science This fundamental statement fully applies to polymer-containing (or polymeric) systems [1,2,3,4,5]. The so-called cloud-point technique is most frequently applied for the phase analysis of polymeric systems, it`consists in determination of the temperature of the initial cloudiness of a solution, which is regarded as the temperature of phase separation (Tps).

Theoretical analysis
Experiment—Theory Comparison
An Alternative Approach
Findings
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call