Abstract
Authors of the paper express their gratitude to V.K. Mamutov, Doctor of Juridical Science, Corresponding Member of the NAS of Ukraine, the Honoured Lawyer of Ukraine, Director of Institute of Economic and Legal Research of NAS of Ukraine, and V.A. Ustymenko for scientific and advisory, and organizational assistance in the process of preparation of materials and pursuance of the relevant studies. Moreover, the authors express thanks to reviewers and editors for their valuable comments and recommendations concerning the improvement of the paper structure.
Highlights
It is planned to develop a technopark, to erect several shopping centres, and to construct a stadium within the former industrial territories [2]. Practices of such foreign countries as USA, RSA, and PRC show that the efficiency of small atypical mines (SAMs) can be achieved owing to the implementation of low-cost coal mining methods adapted to the conditions of finite-reserve mine fields with irregular-shaped geometry, variable hypsometry of coal seams etc. [3], [4]
Before the Law of Ukraine “On the public-private partnership” of 01.07.2010 #2404-VI [14] was adopted, problems of provision of integral property complexes of coal enterprises were solved at a level of the Law of Ukraine “On the lease of public assets and municipal assets” [15], were concretized by terms of leasing agreements as well as special orders by the Ministry of Energy and Environmental Protection of Ukraine
Aftereffects on economic activities by the SAM are meant if services intended to air its mine workings are not provided due to the potential liquidation of the joint ventilation system being under the jurisdiction of SOCE
Summary
The study has been carried out with the use of economic and legal approach being the evaluation of actual technoeconomic activities of the two market participants, i.e. small atypical mine and state-owned mining enterprise, identification of their interaction problems and determination of obstacles preventing from their cooperation. It goes without saying that not construction of new coal mining enterprises or reconstruction of available ones is meant; by that time, all more or less profitable and/or restored mines were either private property or leased out as integral property complexes (further, IPCs) Mechanisms of such a public-private partnership as IPC leasing have helped solve problems of the lack of financing, the established coal market, facilitation on they could not be considered as such due to not rare examples of their technical dependence upon IPC of a state-owned coal producer (further, SOCP) which has already been liquidated, being liquidated, or that designated to liquidation. It is planned to develop a technopark, to erect several shopping centres, and to construct a stadium within the former industrial territories [2] Practices of such foreign countries as USA, RSA, and PRC show that the efficiency of small atypical mines (SAMs) can be achieved owing to the implementation of low-cost coal mining methods adapted to the conditions of finite-reserve mine fields with irregular-shaped geometry, variable hypsometry of coal seams etc. From the viewpoint of political and social impacts, it should be remembered that shock restructuring in Great Britain has become possible in particular owing to their coal industry concentration within one region to compare with Poland and Ukraine where sudden closure of mines would swinge disproportionately populous region depended upon coal industry [5]
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
