Abstract
The paper is devoted to the problematic issues that arise when using the results of investigative activities (IA) at the stage of execution of the sentence. The authors draw attention to the importance of the procedure for proving the facts of concealment of a convicted person from control by the criminal executive inspectorate in cases of submission of submissions to the court on toughening punishments. The information obtained in the course of the IA has a greater informational value for substantiating decisions on issues to be considered by the courts during the execution of a sentence, and their application would make it possible to better motivate the representations of the relevant institutions in the process of proving the need to change penalties and measures of a criminal legal nature that are not related with isolation from society, towards tightening. The paper focuses on the need for an integrated approach to the development of the norms of the current legislation in order to regulate in detail the procedure for conducting IA in relation to persons evading criminal punishment, and measures of legal influence, as well as using the results obtained to substantiate the submissions submitted by criminal executive inspectorates to the court.
Highlights
Таким образом, если задаться вопросом, зачем часть 2 ст. 399 УПК РФ предусматривает право осужденных участвовать в процессе рассмотрения соответствующих представлений, можно прийти к выводу, что суд осуществляет не акцепт представления, а его исследование вместе с иными материалами, в том числе представленными осужденным
The paper is devoted to the problematic issues that arise when using the results of investigative activities (IA) at the stage of execution of the sentence
The information obtained in the course of the IA has a greater informational value for substantiating decisions on issues to be considered by the courts during the execution of a sentence, and their application would make it possible to better motivate the representations of the relevant institutions in the process of proving the need to change penalties and measures of a criminal legal nature that are not related with isolation from society, towards tightening
Summary
Если задаться вопросом, зачем часть 2 ст. 399 УПК РФ предусматривает право осужденных участвовать в процессе рассмотрения соответствующих представлений, можно прийти к выводу, что суд осуществляет не акцепт представления, а его исследование вместе с иными материалами, в том числе представленными осужденным. Особенности использования результатов оперативно-розыскной деятельности на стадии исполнения приговора (на примере обоснования необходимости изменения наказаний и мер уголовно-правового характера, не связанных с изоляцией от общества, в сторону ужесточения)
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
