Abstract

Co-operation, knowledge co-creation and exchange are core components of modern economic models of innovation development. Intensity and efficiency of linkages is widely considered as one of the major determinants of innovation system performance.This paper presents empirical estimates of the scale and character of interactions between companies and research organisations in the Russian economy. The data are derived from the surveys of 1000 enterprises (2011) and 1000 research organisations (2012). The questionnaire is designed to allow characterization of cooperative practices and knowledge demand and supply.One of the key findings on the demand side is significant heterogeneity of involvement by sectors in the knowledge transfer process. Specific sectors (e.g. petrochemistry, equipment manufacturing) are tightly integrated with R&D institutions, while others (e.g. consumer goods, wood processing industries) are not linked to the Russian S&T development complex. This diversity of practices is partly determined by the overall allocation of resources within the economy as well as specific competition regimes that limit short- and medium-term benefits from R&D.Similarly, on the knowledge supply side, R&D organisations do not treat technology transfer as a priority strategy for sustainable development. Indeed, they focus on intellectual services instead of R&D, that is, on consulting andmodification of existing technologies. Among innovation-active companies, only 14% rely on the R&D results of Russian research centers. Of those actually engaged in co-operation, 12% of companies indicate implementation of new-to-the-world products or production processes and 29% new-to-the-country innovations.Generally, low demand for R&D meets limited novelty of research results produced by the research organisations (compared to the technologies available on the global markets). Thus there are limited enclaves of efficient co-operation. These are mainly grouped around traditionally arranged institutional linkages as well as existing allocations of financial resources across the economic sectors.

Highlights

  • This article assesses the degree of involvement of Russian innovative enterprises and scientific or- Keywords: ganisations in processes to create, transfer, and acquire technologies

  • The existence of developed and far-reaching networks of contacts between large- and medium-sized companies, small firms, research centres, universities, authorities, notfor-profit organisations, and others guarantees, supports and stimulates the emergence of new ideas, the generation and dissemination of knowledge, the realisation of technological opportunities, and makes it possible to count on improvements in the efficiency of knowledge transfer, the level of innovative activity, and the receptiveness of economic stakeholders to knowledge and technologies.[2]

  • Commercialisation State bodies which are cli- Businesses engaged in the Research organisations, higher of knowledge ents of scientific and tech- application of new tech- education institutions involved in nological results, training nologies and innovations the transfer, commercialisation of services etc

Read more

Summary

Innovation and Economy

This article assesses the degree of involvement of Russian innovative enterprises and scientific or- Keywords: ganisations in processes to create, transfer, and acquire technologies One of the promising areas for the development of NIS (and related research in) is linked to the intensive circulation of intellectual capital in the overall production and demand system for economic and other benefits. Such circulation directly affects subjective, institutional, functional and other measures of innovation systems (Table 1). Companies collating information on potential growth areas and engaging in innovative activity based on this in practice (production) These (directly or indirectly) provide a stimulus for R&D to be carried out (and often themselves come to carry out or participate in the R&D) and generate real demand for new knowledge. The challenge of effectively coordinating key NIS actors – organisations and businesses engaged

Institutional sectors
Public sector science
Corporate research institutes and training centres
Forms of technology transfer
The implementation of domestic scientific and technological results
Publishing and printing activities
Food industry
High competition from foreign developers
Nature of contact with implementing organisations
Form of scientific and technological results transfer
The high cost and complexity of the technological
Attitude towards public regulations and policies
Findings
Quality control of the scientific and technological results to be transferred
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call