Abstract

BackgroundResearch in biomedical text categorization has mostly used the bag-of-words representation. Other more sophisticated representations of text based on syntactic, semantic and argumentative properties have been less studied. In this paper, we evaluate the impact of different text representations of biomedical texts as features for reproducing the MeSH annotations of some of the most frequent MeSH headings. In addition to unigrams and bigrams, these features include noun phrases, citation meta-data, citation structure, and semantic annotation of the citations.ResultsTraditional features like unigrams and bigrams exhibit strong performance compared to other feature sets. Little or no improvement is obtained when using meta-data or citation structure. Noun phrases are too sparse and thus have lower performance compared to more traditional features. Conceptual annotation of the texts by MetaMap shows similar performance compared to unigrams, but adding concepts from the UMLS taxonomy does not improve the performance of using only mapped concepts. The combination of all the features performs largely better than any individual feature set considered. In addition, this combination improves the performance of a state-of-the-art MeSH indexer. Concerning the machine learning algorithms, we find that those that are more resilient to class imbalance largely obtain better performance.ConclusionsWe conclude that even though traditional features such as unigrams and bigrams have strong performance compared to other features, it is possible to combine them to effectively improve the performance of the bag-of-words representation. We have also found that the combination of the learning algorithm and feature sets has an influence in the overall performance of the system. Moreover, using learning algorithms resilient to class imbalance largely improves performance. However, when using a large set of features, consideration needs to be taken with algorithms due to the risk of over-fitting. Specific combinations of learning algorithms and features for individual MeSH headings could further increase the performance of an indexing system.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12859-015-0539-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Highlights

  • Research in biomedical text categorization has mostly used the bag-of-words representation

  • Overall we can see that AdaBoostM1 with oversampling and SVM optimized for multi-variate measures perform much better

  • We could try improving the performance of unigrams by combining them with other feature sets (MTI performance has been shown to improve by combining several sources of information)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Research in biomedical text categorization has mostly used the bag-of-words representation. Each MEDLINE citation is manually assigned a number of relevant medical subject headings that classify the document according to its topic. As stated in [2], MEDLINE indexing is Jimeno Yepes et al BMC Bioinformatics (2015) 16:113 the responsibility of a relatively small group of highly qualified indexing contractors and staff at the NLM who find it difficult to maintain the quality of this huge resource. In this situation, automatic methods to categorize citations might be relevant

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.