Abstract

Operation of low temperature polymer electrolyte fuel cells (PEFCs) require up to 99.97% purity hydrogen with CO concentrations mandated to be below 0.2 ppmv by ISO 14687-2 standards [1]. The production and application of such high purity hydrogen increases the fuel price and overall cost of fuel cell operation due to the requirement of additional pre-purification measures. Indian Oil Corporation is the largest producer of reformate hydrogen with up to 99.9% purity in India. It contains traces of methane, carbon monoxide and carbon dioxide as some of the major impurities. This low-cost hydrogen could conceivably be used in PEFCs subject to operando mitigation of CO poisoning with the aid of techniques such as pulsed oxidation [2] and air-bleeding [3] to deliver satisfactory performance [4]. However, the long term impacts of these techniques and their feasibility in terms of overall efficiency and cost must be carefully assessed.In this work, we present a detailed investigation of the pulsed oxidation technique to mitigate the effect of CO poisoning in long term PEFC operation. A single cell PEFC with an active area of 25 cm2 and Pt-Ru as the anode electrocatalyst is subjected to 80 ppm CO fuel at a nominal operating current density. Pulsed oxidation operation for 4000 cycles showed a consistent performance recovery up to 90% compared with pure hydrogen potentials. Performance governing parameters such as average potential, peak potential and droptime are presented to show changes in cell performance and pulsed oxidation efficiency. A one-dimensional transient model is developed to detect variations in cell potential and surface coverages of species during poisoning and its pulsing process. The model results show up to 26 % increase in the overall efficiency of the cell with and without the application of pulsing process as a function of bleed rates (anode flow). The technical and economic feasibility of operating a PEFC with impure hydrogen with pulsing is demonstrated.Acknowledgement: This work was supported by Indian Oil Corporation (R&D) and Simon Fraser University under the SFU-IOCL joint PhD program in clean energy.[1] B. Shabani, M. Hafttananian, S. Khamani, A. Ramiar, A.A. Ranjbar, J. Power Sources. 427 (2019) 21–48.[2] P. J. Sarma, C. L. Gardner, S. Chugh, A. Sharma, E. Kjeang, J. Power Sources (2020)[3] L-Yu Sung, B-Joe Hwang, K-Lin Hsueh, W-Nien Su, C-Chung Yang, J. Power Sources 242 (2013) 264-272[4] C.L. Gardner, D. Mehta, S. Chugh, E. Kjeang, J. Electrochem. Soc. 166 (2019) F3123–F3135 Figure 1

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.