Feasibility of the application of deep learning-reconstructed ultra-fast respiratory-triggered T2-weighted imaging at 3 T in liver imaging

Abstract

ObjectiveThe evaluate the feasibility of a novel deep learning-reconstructed ultra-fast respiratory-triggered T2WI sequence (DL-RT-T2WI) In liver imaging, compared with respiratory-triggered Arms-T2WI (Arms-RT-T2WI) and respiratory-triggered FSE-T2WI (FSE-RT-T2WI) sequences. Methods71 patients with liver lesions underwent 3-T MRI and were prospectively enrolled. Two readers independently analyzed images acquired with DL-RT-T2WI, Arms-RT-T2WI, and FSE-RT-T2WI. The qualitative evaluation indicators, including overall image quality (OIQ), sharpness, noise, artifacts, lesion detectability (LC), lesion characterization (LD), cardiacmotion–related signal loss (CSL), and diagnostic confidence (DC), were evaluated in two readers, and further statistically compared using paired Wilcoxon rank-sum test among three sequences. Results176 lesions were detected in DL-RT-T2W and Arms-RT-T2WI, and 175 were detected in FSE-RT-T2WI. The acquisition time of DL-RT-T2WI was improved by 4.8–7.9 folds compared to the other two sequences. The OIQ was scored highest for DL-RT-T2WI (R1, 4.61 ± 0.52 and R2, 4.62 ± 0.49), was significantly superior to Arms-RT-T2WI (R1, 4.30 ± 0.66 and R2, 4.34 ± 0.69) and FSE-RT-T2WI (R1, 3.65 ± 1.08 and R2, 3.75 ± 1.01). Artifacts and sharpness scored highest for DL-RT-T2WI, followed by Arms-RT-T2WI, and were lowest for FSE-RT-T2WI in both two readers. Noise and CSL for DL-RT-T2WI scored similar to Arms-RT-T2WI (P > 0.05) and were significantly superior to FSE-RT-T2WI (P < 0.001). Both LD and LC for DL-RT-T2WI were significantly superior to Arms-RT-T2WI and FSE-RT-T2WI in two readers (P < 0.001). DC for DL-RT-T2WI scored best, significantly superior to Arms-RT-T2WI (P < 0.010) and FSE-RT-T2WI (P < 0.001). ConclusionsThe novel ultra-fast DL-RT-T2WI is feasible for liver imaging and lesion characterization and diagnosis, not only offers a significant improvement in acquisition time but also outperforms Arms-RT-T2WI and FSE-RT-T2WI concerning image quality and DC.