Abstract

Although current guidelines recommend admission to the intensive/coronary care unit (ICU/CCU) for patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (MI), routine use of the CCU in uncomplicated patients with acute MI remains controversial. We aimed to evaluate the safety of management in the general ward (GW) of hemodynamically stable patients with acute MI after primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Using a large nationwide administrative database, a cohort of 19426 patients diagnosed with acute MI in 52 hospitals where a CCU was available were retrospectively analyzed. Patients with mechanical cardiac support and Killip classification 4, and those without primary PCI on admission were excluded. A total of 5736 patients were included and divided into the CCU (n = 3488) and GW (n = 2248) groups according to the type of hospitalization room after primary PCI. Propensity score matching was performed, and 1644 pairs were matched. The primary endpoint was in-hospital mortality at 30 days. The CCU group had a higher rate of Killip classification 3 and ambulance use than the GW group. There was no significant difference in the incidence of in-hospital mortality within 30 days among the matched subjects. Multivariable Cox proportional hazard model analysis among unmatched patients supported the findings (hazard ratio 1.12, 95% confidence interval 0.66-1.91, p = 0.67). The use of the GW was not associated with higher in-hospital mortality in hemodynamically stable patients with acute MI after primary PCI. It may be feasible for the selected patients to be directly admitted to the GW after primary PCI.

Highlights

  • Acute myocardial infarction (MI) remains a leading cause of death worldwide [1]

  • The use of the general ward (GW) was not associated with higher in-hospital mortality in hemodynamically stable patients with acute MI after primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)

  • It may be feasible for the selected patients to be directly admitted to the GW after primary PCI

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Acute myocardial infarction (MI) remains a leading cause of death worldwide [1]. the prognosis of patients with acute MI has improved in recent decades and is mainly attributed to accessibility to early reperfusion therapy and established medical treatments [2, 3]. Acute MI patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) have better prognoses than their non-PCI counterparts, resulting in in-hospital mortality ranging from 2% to 6% [5, 6]. The impact of CCU had been established before the reperfusion therapy era, the incidence of complications has been greatly reduced by early reperfusion therapy, primary PCI [9, 10]. It is unknown whether CCU is still beneficial to patients with acute MI undergoing primary PCI. We aimed to evaluate the safety of management in the general ward (GW) of hemodynamically stable patients with acute MI after primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)

Objectives
Methods
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call