Abstract

In genetic epidemiology, adoption and twin study designs are the most commonly used designs to identify genetic and common environmental components underlying familial aggregation. Other fixed family set designs such as a half-sibling design can also be applied to test the same hypothesis. The feasibility of half-sibling designs for detecting a genetic (single-locus or multifactorial) source of familial aggregation of a disease is studied and is compared to both adoption and twin study designs. Results are presented for two types of design when the sampling units are relative pairs reared apart (I) or reared together (II). Although they generally require more observations to achieve the same power, designs involving half-siblings may be more feasible in situations where there is greater availability of these relatives.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.